Fall Term 2008 Weekly Schedule

September 29th, 2008

Weekly Schedule

Mondays:

3 – 4 PM Weekly Leadership Meetings in P&P Office 48E in the Basement of Creese Student Center– If you want to be involved in planning what we are doing this is when you need to show up.  Contact Brian – bjm63@drexel.edu

8 PM Who Is This Jesus – A Discussion Based Study of the Life of Jesus in the Multi – Purpose Room of Kelly Dormitory.  This discussion based Bible Study is designed for new students @ Drexel but is open to everyone.  We will be talking about the Life of Jesus in a way that will allow both Jesus “experts” and “beginners” to join in.  Tonight there will be Pizza and Soda.  Come on out and bring a friend.  If you don’t have a friend we can loan you one.  Tim McJilton and Mike Bates will be leading.  If you need more information contact them at trm43@drexel.edu or mlb74@drexel.edu .

Tuesdays:

1 PM Mid-Day Prayer @ Starbucks in Pearlstein.  Brian will be holding a short discussion/devotional and prayer time.  It will be a great time to refocus yourself during the middle of the day and if you are a commuter you don’t have to stay late.  Typically we will start @ 1:15 and end at 1:45 but this time will be extremely flexible to fit into your day.

6 – 8 PM Ecclesiastes Bible Study – 1st week 9/30 we will meet in the P&P Office 48E in the Basement of Creese Student Center.  The Ecclesiastes Bible Study is our male discipleship group.  We will continue walking through one of the most interesting books of the Bible verse by verse.  This is a great group of guys who hold each other accountable to what we say we believe and how we say we should live.

Thursdays:

5 – 6:30 PM Women’s Discipleship Group - Ross Commons Rm 314.  Unfortunately the location is still undetermined but this will be a great time where Drexel Women can come together and discuss how to be excellent at all that they do:  excellence in their Christian walk, excellence in their academics, excellence in their careers and excellence in their social world.  This is  a great group of women who really care and support each other as they balance being a Christian Women and a Drexel Dragon.

Schedule of Special Events for Fall 2008

September 20th, 2008

Canceled!!!!  Friday and Saturday 10/24 - 25 KALEO at Houston Hall on UPenn’s campus Check out www.kaleoconference.com

Saturday 10/26 7-10 PM @ the Private Dinning Room in the Creese Student Center Basement.  Concepts and Core Values - A Funky Hip-Hop Open Mic experience as we delve into our Pinocchio Nation.  Come Check us Out and bring some Rhymes if you got’em.

Feature Artist - Believin’ Steven.  Wrapping our mind around the big idea - Pastor Early Jackson

Saturday 11/1 - The Foundry in U. City kick-off featuring Mike Licona.
Mike Licona is the North American Mission Board Apologetics Specialist.
He is an author and has been featured in several key books. 


Who is the “Real” Jesus? 

History, Hogwash, & Hot Air. 

 

Recent books by authors such as Bart Ehrman, Elaine Pagels, and others portray   Jesus in radically different ways than how He is presented in the New Testament.  In this seminar, author Mike Licona shows how to distinguish the authentic Jesus from counterfeits, and explains how to turn modern assaults on Jesus into opportunities to share the gospel. 

Check out www.thefoundrychurch.org for info on The Foundry and www.risenjesus.com for info on Mike Licona.

 



Thursday and Friday 11/13 + 14 PEACEMAKER Seminars
Check out www.peacemaker.net

Monday and Tuesday 12/1 + 2 HIV/AIDS conference.
Check out here for info on our special guest.

Finals Week Prayer

September 3rd, 2008

Dear Heavenly Father, Lord God Almighty,

You are an awesome God who is in control of the entire Universe.  You have established the ends of the Earth and where the boundaries of existence rest.  As we study, whatever knowledge we obtain, allow us to have the real and legitimate experience that this new knowledge is knowledge of you.  As we study computers, or engineering, or biology, or business, or art and film, or international area studies, or anything thing else let us come in contact with the the true Lord over all knowledge the God who is wisdom.  Allow us to love the Lord our God with all of our minds!!!!!

Lord, give us the discipline to sit down and accomplish what needs to be done.

Lord, give us peace of mind and the time needed to devote the necessary amount of time to study.

Lord, allow no distractions, no interruptions, no frustrations.  Allow papers and projects to be finished correctly the first time.  Allow concepts to make sense quickly.  Allow information to be retained easily.

Lord, give us the ability to reproduce accurately the information and knowledge we have accumulated.  Do not let stress and anxiety to discourage us during the test taking process.

But most importantly, allow us to have a proper perspective on who we are as persons outside of our accomplishments in the classroom.  We are more valuable that a grade on an examine.  We are of infinite worth because the infinite God wants to have a relationship with us no matter our grades.

Lord, you are awesome.  Thank you for all that you do.  Thank you for hearing our prayers.  Be with us in this time.  And we prayer all these things in the strong name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

Welcome New Students to the Land of the Dragon - Drexel University

August 25th, 2008

I would like to take this opportunity to welcome all who will be joining Drexel University this fall. May this year be an amazing adventure through which you grow emotionally, socially, physically, educationally and spiritually (not necessarily in that order). For those of you who are interested check out these events happening in the very beginning of the term:

New Student Move-In - representatives from P&P will be around during
move-in to help carry stuff. If you want help let us know when and
where and we’ll be there.

Goose-the-Philly - The first Saturday of the term P&P will be
conducting a sightseeing/get to know Philly tour via public
transportation (SEPTA).

Find-A-Chruch - The first four Sundays P&P will partner with Campus
Crusade and other Christian groups to introduce new students to
churches in Philadelphia area. This is especially important if you are
from out of town.

Harvest Crusade - Greg Laurie, Mercy Me, Kutless, TobyMac and others
will be in Philly October 3 -5 and we can go for free.

There will be many more opportunities such as Bible Studies, Prayer
Groups, Service Projects and Missions throughout the year. These are
just a few big thing that are right at the beginning of the year. More
info to come.

For more info check out:
www.peaceandpower.com/blog
and our facebook group PEACE & POWER Christian Fellowship

In Christ,
Brian Musser
Baptist Campus Minister @ Drexel University

Who Are We? A Missional Redefinition of Christian Community. (Edit for Lifeway Christian Fellowship 8/24/2008)

August 24th, 2008

A Missional Re-definition of Community.

Today, we will be examining Daniel’s prayer in Daniel 9:4 – 19, but before we get there I want us to take a moment and look at Revelation 7:9 (NIV):

“After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands.”

A couple months ago this verse struck me. John, a first century Jewish man, was given the ability to see heaven. Among the persons in heaven worshipping Christ, John, a first century Jewish man, was able to recognize nations, tribes, people and languages. The characteristics that make us different here are preserved in heaven. Our diversity and differences are not necessarily evil because they remain when we get to heaven and they remain in a way that John was still able to notice them. Often we use our differences to divide and segregate and create prejudices with them so therefore we often see our differences as a result of sin and see our differences as evil. But if we are still different and diverse in heaven, then the differences themselves are not necessarily evil, just our reactions to them. We often use our differences, whatever they may be, to create an “us versus them” mentality.

A few months ago on Drexel’s campus, I had the privilege of listening to a Tibetan Buddhist Monk, who had trained under the Dalai Lama. He talked about the circumstances between Tibet and China. The dialogue was interesting in how it compared to so many other situations in our world currently and throughout the past. The conflict stemmed around the simple concept of “us” and “them.” Who are “we” as a group? Who are “they” – the group that is not “us”; the group that is “different from us”? In Tibet the Tibetans see themselves as distinct from the Chinese. They say we are Tibetans and Chinese are not us, however; the Chinese have a different definition. They say that the Tibetans have been and are a part of China. They are not distinct from us but one of us. The Chinese say what is good for China is also good for the Tibetans because the Tibetans are part of China. The Tibetans respond saying what is good for China has actually been bad for Tibet and the Tibetans. China points to the roads, schools, businesses and homes that they have brought into Tibet. They point to the way they have developed Tibet. The Tibetans see these things and point out that these developments have only been good for the Chinese residents of Tibet. The Chinese rebuttal is that all the residents of Tibet are Chinese.

We try to define “us versus them” in terms that are most beneficial to us. We label them as different from us. What is different from us is necessarily wrong. What is wrong now becomes evil and eventually what is evil can be punished. This can happen because of differences in skin color, sex, ability, financial standing, ethnic heritage, lifestyle, religious beliefs and nationality. I am always right and you are different than me so that makes you wrong. Because you are willfully wrong you must be evil. Because you are evil I can be justified in my hatred, prejudice and violence toward you. This is the common course of human thinking. Black versus white, Croats versus Serbians, Russians versus Georgians, Shiites versus Sunnis, Jews versus Gentiles, Christians versus Muslims, Americans versus Communists, Eagles versus Giants all are tainted with an “us versus them mentality.” The “us versus them” I want you to have in mind as we travel through the rest of today is the “us” that is inside these walls versus the “them” that is outside: Christians versus the lost; sinners versus saints; the church versus the world.

The current and popular remedy for the problem of “us versus them” is to deny the existence of any differences whatsoever. All people are exactly the same. All cultures are equally good and valuable. All thoughts and ideas are equally valid. All religions are equally true. All moral choices are equally justifiable. Right and wrong are no longer absolute choices but a matter of personal preference like eating ice cream. What is your favorite flavor of ice cream? Tolerance is today’s moral buzz word. We must be accepting of those different than us. God is handled the same way. What is your favorite flavor of God? Yet this brings up some logical absurdities. If there are no moral rights and wrongs how do we label things that we know as true evil? How do we say the prison camps at Auschwitz were true evil? How do we say something is truly good? If there is no absolute good and bad how can the sacrificial love of a mother be truly labeled as good? Even the very statement “there are no moral absolutes” is an absolute moral statement. In classical logic that is called a self-defeating argument. A self-defeating argument is one that if it is true, it is also false. If there are no moral absolutes then even the statement there are no moral absolutes is not absolute. Tolerance and relativism is not the answer we need.

Miroslav Volf, a professor at Yale Divinity School, changes the discussion. The destruction of differences is not the goal. There will always be the categories of us and them. There will always be those people like us and those unlike us. We will always separate, categorize and differentiate between people. There are some differences that cannot be overlooked. What is necessary is that we must become the type of people able to embrace or love the “evil other.” Volf’s hometown is Sarajevo. He was actually interrogated / tortured as a Christian while serving in the Yugoslavian army. He then watched his country and city be torn apart by violent civil wars. The “evil other” is not an abstract idea. To him the evil other is the Yugoslavian Army captain that brutally tried to force him to confess crimes against the state. To him the evil other is the Serbian Cetnik Terrorist that mortared his hometown. Miroslav Volf truly knows the concept of the evil other. He cannot deny that some actions are atrocious but how does he live in this world in the presence of true evil? How does he love the evil doer?

For answer to these questions we are going to look at a particular passage of Scripture found in Daniel 9. This is a prayer uttered by Daniel for his people the Israelites. I’m going to read it in full stopping from time to time to make some commentary.

Daniel 9:4-19 (New International Version)

4 I prayed to the LORD my God and confessed:
“O Lord, the great and awesome God, who keeps his covenant of love with all who love him and obey his commands, 5 we have sinned and done wrong. We have been wicked and have rebelled; we have turned away from your commands and laws. 6 We have not listened to your servants the prophets, who spoke in your name to our kings, our princes and our fathers, and to all the people of the land. 7 “Lord, you are righteous, but this day we are covered with shame—the men of Judah and people of Jerusalem and all Israel, both near and far, in all the countries where you have scattered us because of our unfaithfulness to you. 8 O LORD, we and our kings, our princes and our fathers are covered with shame because we have sinned against you. 9 The Lord our God is merciful and forgiving, even though we have rebelled against him; 10 we have not obeyed the LORD our God or kept the laws he gave us through his servants the prophets. 11 All Israel has transgressed your law and turned away, refusing to obey you.
“Therefore the curses and sworn judgments written in the Law of Moses, the servant of God, have been poured out on us, because we have sinned against you. 12 You have fulfilled the words spoken against us and against our rulers by bringing upon us great disaster. Under the whole heaven nothing has ever been done like what has been done to Jerusalem. 13 Just as it is written in the Law of Moses, all this disaster has come upon us, yet we have not sought the favor of the LORD our God by turning from our sins and giving attention to your truth. 14 The LORD did not hesitate to bring the disaster upon us, for the LORD our God is righteous in everything he does; yet we have not obeyed him.

Did you notice how many time Daniel uses the first person plural when referring to the sins of the Israelites? Daniel intentionally, willingly, freely and deliberately accepts the sin of his people as his own. From a human perspective he did not necessarily have to do this. He was taken captive into Babylon as a man probably in his late teens. He could have easily distanced himself from the sins that Israel had committed in the land because of his young age when he went into exile. He could have prayed about what they did back then. He chose not to. He chose to accept moral responsibility for the sins of his people. Also, in scripture Daniel is one of the few people not directly implicated in any sin. He is pictured as a morally righteous person. He is shown as someone who is willing to do the right thing for God no matter how it will affect him. The story about Daniel and the lion’s den is a prime example of this. He could have separated himself from them by his upright and righteous life. He could have been like the Pharisee in Jesus’ parable and prayed

11The Pharisee stood up and prayed about himself: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other men—robbers, evildoers, adulterers—or even like this tax collector. 12I fast twice a week and give a tenth of all I get.’

Instead Daniel through his pray becomes one with his people. Their sin is his sin. Their suffering is his suffering. Their punishment is his punishment. Harold A. Sevener says, “Never once does Daniel exclude himself from the sins of the nation. Never once does he blame the people, while claiming to be exempt from their sin problem.” Often we try to define us and them in the most beneficial way for us. We try to use the categories of us and them to limit the guilt we have.

Allow me to illustrate. 91% of outsiders to Christianity between the ages of 16 to 29 label Christianity as anti-homosexual. Sexual morals are important to us and they should be but sometimes we present them to the exclusion of persons. 91% of outsiders don’t think that we are against homosexuality and for “family values.” 91% think we are against the homosexual. We have created an “us versus them” mentality. Peter, age 34, says, “Many people in the gay community don’t seem to have issues with Jesus but rather with those claiming to represent him today. It’s very much an ‘us-versus-them’ mentality, as if a war has been declared. Of course each side thinks the other fired the opening shot.” We should proclaim the idea of a Biblical marriage and stand up for moral values. That is a good thing. But how will a homosexual ever come to Christ if we allow them to have the idea that Christ’s representatives here on this earth, Christians, are his mortal enemy? How will he ever come to know the life changing grace available through Christ if we are afraid of being contaminated by his guilt? By the way we don’t have to worry about his sin condemning us. We already have enough sin of our own to do that and even if it did Christ’s grace is sufficient for that, too. Then again how does it look when we are defined within society by screaming a certain set of moral values and then Catholic priests get on the news for abusing children and then a Mormon compound is taken into federal custody? To the outsider this is the pinnacle of hypocrisy. Our typical response is to isolate ourselves from the moral guilt by saying “Catholics are not real Christians” and “Mormonism is a cult.” While this has validity within these walls to an outsider it looks like political waffling, name calling, blame shifting and trying to weasel out of trouble.

Instead of trying to remove himself from guilt, Daniel accepts full responsibility for the sin of his people. As American Protestant Christians are there sins that we need to truly own? Who are our people and do we as a people have a collective, moral guilt? Is slavery still an issue? Do we owe something to Native Americans? Japanese Americans? The Jewish people? Muslims? Women? The unborn? Quite often as Christians we try to separate ourselves from the sins of others. We claim that we had no part in slavery. We claim that we had nothing to do with the Crusades. We claim that abortion is their problem and not ours. We claim that homosexuality is not our issue but others. We distance ourselves so that the stink of their guilt doesn’t rub off on us.

15 “Now, O Lord our God, who brought your people out of Egypt with a mighty hand and who made for yourself a name that endures to this day, we have sinned, we have done wrong. 16 O Lord, in keeping with all your righteous acts, turn away your anger and your wrath from Jerusalem, your city, your holy hill. Our sins and the iniquities of our fathers have made Jerusalem and your people an object of scorn to all those around us. 17 Now, our God, hear the prayers and petitions of your servant. For your sake, O Lord, look with favor on your desolate sanctuary. 18 Give ear, O God, and hear; open your eyes and see the desolation of the city that bears your Name. We do not make requests of you because we are righteous, but because of your great mercy. 19 O Lord, listen! O Lord, forgive! O Lord, hear and act! For your sake, O my God, do not delay, because your city and your people bear your Name.”

Daniel then turns in his prayer to petition God for grace and mercy for his people. God’s deliverance in the past gives Daniel hope for deliverance in the future. God has shown himself to be merciful in the past so we can expect him to be merciful in the future. God has shown himself to be a gracious and loving God. We can trust in him to be gracious and loving once more. Daniel does not demand that God fulfill his prophecy. Daniel does not claim that he has any right to be heard or any special knowledge of God’s will. Daniel merely and meekly petitions for mercy. His petition for mercy is not based on merit at all. No one not even Daniel deserves the mercy of God but everyone can request it. In so doing Daniel becomes like Christ. In accepting the sins of his people as his own and asking for mercy he models Christ. The grace that is available to Daniel and through Daniel to his people is only available because of Christ.

Allow me to read to you a quote from Watchman Nee, a Chines Christian from the beginning of the 20th Century.

Nothing has done greater damage to our Christian testimony than our trying to be right and demanding right of others. We become preoccupied with what is and what is not right. We ask ourselves, “Have we been justly or unjustly treated?” and we think thus to vindicate our actions. But that is not our standard. The whole question for us is one of cross-bearing. You ask me, “Is it right for someone to strike my cheek?” I reply, “Of course not! But the question is, do you only want to be right?” As Christians our standard of living can never be “right or wrong,” but the Cross. The principle of the Cross is our principle of conduct. Praise God that He makes His sun to shine on the evil and the good. With Him it is a question of His grace and not of right or wrong.

Watchman Nee goes on to illustrate his point with a story.

A brother in South China had a rice field in the middle of a hill. In time of drought he used a water-wheel, worked by a tread-mill, to lift water from the irrigation stream into his field. His neighbor had two fields below his, and, one night, made a breach in the dividing bank and drained off all his water. When the brother repaired the breached and pumped in more water his neighbor did the same thing again, and this was repeated three or four times. So he consulted his brethren, “I have tried to be patient and not to retaliate,” he said, “but is it right?” After they had prayed together about it, one of them replied, “If we only try to do the right thing, surely we are very poor Christians. We have to do something more than what is right.” The brother was much impressed. Next morning he pumped water for the two fields below, and in the afternoon pumped water for his own field. After that the water stayed in his field. His neighbor was so amazed at his action that he began to inquire the reason, and in the course of time he too became a Christian.

Let’s take a step back and see this story replayed on a cosmic scale. The Trinity eternally existed in a perfect community, a Holy symphony of us. You have the Father who intimately and passionately and completely loves the Son and the Spirit. Then you have the Son who is perfectly united in love with the Father and the Spirit. Then you have the Spirit who dwells in an eternal Holy relationship with both the Father and the Son. Three persons so completely united in an eternal loving relationship that they are truly one being. The Trinity is the true definition of community. They are the true definition of an “us.” This Trinity creates. This Trinity creates humanity to be in their image. Part of this image was to be in relationship with God; however, because of sin we have severed that relationship. We have become unlike God. We have destroyed relationships. If God is an eternal community of loving relationships, that is the Trinity, and we are the destroyer of relationships, that makes us completely and totally unlike God. We are the antithesis of God. In God’s eyes we are truly the “evil other.” Every single one of us is the “evil other.” The destruction of our relationship with the Trinity has created a true “us versus them.”

From a human perspective God had every right to sever all ties with us. He could have easily chosen to distance himself from us. He would be just to allow us to eternally exist separated from Him. He doesn’t want His holiness to get contaminated by our sin. He doesn’t want His perfection to become infected with our guilt. But this is not the God I serve. The Trinity intentionally, willingly, freely, and deliberately sends Jesus directly into our mess. God becomes man. He lives a perfect human life. He suffers enormous human suffering. He takes on all our human sin and human guilt. On the cross Jesus stinks of the worst of humanity. He dies an atrocious human death. Then three days later he is resurrected into new life. Making his life our model, his death our atonement and his resurrection our hope. Through Jesus, the community of the Trinity missionally leaves heaven and sacrificially becomes human so that He can redemptively restore us to a right relationship with him. As humans this is our God, our savior and our redeemer. You don’t make Jesus Lord. You don’t make Jesus your savior and redeemer. He is the only Lord and the only savior and the only redeemer humanity will ever know. He is God coming into our situation an atoning for our sin so that we can get back right with God. The question is not is Jesus your savior. The question is have you admitted that you need a savior and have accepted him as the only savior you could possibly have.

For the many of us in this room we have a restored relationship with God through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, let’s now turn our attention back to Daniel. Because Daniel knew the grace of God he was able look at his community with grace filled eyes. He wasn’t worried about their sin contaminating him. He was able to be Christ-like and enter into his community and pray the grace of God into their lives. My question for each of you individually and as a church corporately; what communities are you intentionally reaching into to redeem with the grace of God through Jesus Christ. I would like to see the church defined as a people not by the community that sits within these walls but defined by the community outside of these walls that we are intentionally, willingly, freely, deliberately and sacrificially investing ourselves into for the grace of God. When we see the homeless in our community they are our homeless. When we see broken families in our communities they are our families. When we see single mothers in our community those are our mothers, or our sisters or our daughters. When there is financial greed in our community it is our own sin. When there is sexual sin in our community it affects us as if it were our own sexual sin. When there is evil and pain in our community it should be our evil and our pain. There is no “us versus them.” We missionally, sacrificially and redemptively enter into the sin that is all around us as “little Christs,” as Christians.

The final question we have to answer is who our community is. Who is God directly calling us to minister to? Who is God calling us to minister to individually and who is God calling us to minister to corporately? It is the question that was asked of Jesus so long ago; “Who is my neighbor?” I cannot answer that for each of you but let me share one conversation with you that I had with the Methodist Minister at Drexel. Tim says to me, “I really feel like I’m neglecting my community and my church because I spend so much time here on this campus with the students.” My reply was, “I know exactly what you are talking about so much so that I have just completely accepted Drexel as my community that I am going to intentionally invest in.” I think each one of us will personally have a different community in which we will invest ourselves into for the sake of the kingdom of God. For some it will be children, others students, others the homeless. For some it will be a geographic location like their street or their apartment building. For others it will be a life situation, pregnant teenagers, or football players, or homosexuals. Ethnic groups are a possibility as well. Religions and worldviews are another category. Then as a body, as a church, you also need to answer this question on a corporate scale. Who is the community, who are the communities that God has called Lifeway Christian Fellowship to minister to? Who are you ministering to locally, regionally, nationally, internationally? Like I said before I pray that someday our community is not defined by who sits inside these walls but by the lives we touch outside of these walls.

2 Chronicles 7:14 (New International Version)

14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land.

That verse is quite of ten used to call “them” back to God but if read carefully it is not talking to “them.” It is talking to “us.” May we like Daniel be the humble, prayerful, repentant God-seekers who lead our entire community into forgiveness and our whole land into peace.

JOB

July 20th, 2008

Job:  God’s Chosen Priest

The book of Job is one of the most profound books in all of human history.  Although, there are many fine lessons we can take from it I think that the main idea of the book is often misrepresented.  The book does speak to Job’s perseverance in the face of turmoil.  Job is an excellent example for us in times of trouble.  I think the book can be used to teach on self-righteousness.  Even though, Job was blameless he is still humbled in the presence of God.  We also can use it as a worst-case scenario model of what not to do when your friend is suffering.  I think we should listen to this lesson more often.  However good, valuable and accessible these ideas are in the text I think they miss the main point of the text.  They miss the point because they miss the main character.  The main character of the book of Job is not Job.  Who is the main character of the book of Job?  God is the main character and the main point of the story deals with all of humanity’s motivation to give God worship.  Why is God worthy to be worshipped?  Today we are going to examine the book of Job from this perspective.  What does the book of Job say about the worship of God?  We are going to race through the entire story extracting a few specific passages for our careful observation and commentary.

I.                     Satan’s challenge is directed at God not at Job

Job 1:6-12 (NIV)

One day the angels came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came with them.  The LORD said to Satan, “Where have you come from?”

Satan answered the LORD, “From roaming through the earth and going back and forth in it.”

Then the LORD said to Satan, “Have you considered my servant Job? There is no one on earth like him; he is blameless and upright, a man who fears God and shuns evil.”

“Does Job fear God for nothing?” Satan replied. “Have you not put a hedge around him and his household and everything he has? You have blessed the work of his hands, so that his flocks and herds are spread throughout the land. But stretch out your hand and strike everything he has, and he will surely curse you to your face.”

The LORD said to Satan, “Very well, then, everything he has is in your hands, but on the man himself do not lay a finger.” Then Satan went out from the presence of the LORD.

 

            This passage always bothered me.  It may be one of the most troubling passages to me in the entire Bible.  From reading the passage it always seemed that God instigated a game between him and Satan in which Job was just a hapless pawn.  It was almost like God and Satan used Job as the object of a “gentleman’s wager.”  Why does God purposefully draw Satan’s attention to Job?  Why does God accept Satan’s proposal when He knows this will end terribly for Job?

            After a closer reading of the passage I discovered that one of my concerns was wrong.  God did not bring Job to Satan’s attention.  Because if you look at Satan’s answer, he already knew details about the hedge of protection placed around Job and the specific blessings God had bestowed upon Job.  It would be easy to speculate that one of the places Satan was roaming through earth was in Job’s back yard.  God may have started the conversation on Job but Satan had already scoped Job out.

            Then the second issue I had with this passage was relieved by understanding the gravity of the challenge Satan makes toward God.  The question; “Does Job fear God for nothing?” is the crux of the challenge between God and Satan.  You could reword Satan’s challenge to sound something like this; “Of course, Job worships you.  You have made sure his life is blessed and through that you have bought his worship.”  The real issue in the book of Job is does God have to buy our worship.  Is God worthy of our worship purely because of who He is or is it just because of all the good things He has done for us?  An unstated subtext to this challenge is Satan’s belief that he can buy humanity’s worship just as easy as God can.  If God has to buy our worship is there any substantial difference between Him and Satan except the amount of their power?  Satan’s challenge is one that God was willing to answer and Job was the person he specifically chose to answer the challenge.  God allows Satan access to destroy Job’s life.  Over the next 42 chapters we get to watch that destruction and the reaction to it.

II.                 Do we worship God because of material blessings?

First God allows Satan to take Job’s possessions.  From chapter 1 we learn that Job was an extremely wealthy man.  He owned 7,000 sheep, 3,000 camels, 1,000 oxen, 500 donkeys and many servants.  In three separate simultaneous events, two of which were human oriented and one that was an act of nature, Job’s sheep, camels, oxen, donkeys and servants are either stolen or destroyed.  Job also had seven sons and three daughters.  They were feasting at the oldest brother’s house and a great wind came and knocked down the house killing all of Job’s children.  In a moment Job is decimated.

Job 1:20-22 (NIV)

At this, Job got up and tore his robe and shaved his head. Then he fell to the ground in worship and said:

       “Naked I came from my mother’s womb,

       and naked I will depart.

       The LORD gave and the LORD has taken away;

       may the name of the LORD be praised.”

In all this, Job did not sin by charging God with wrongdoing.

 

Nobody will ever say that Job was a happy man after these events but he still held God in the proper perspective.  He still honored God as the Lord of the universe.  He did not use the events that happened to him as an excuse to sin.  This makes us ask questions of ourselves.  Is God more important than our stuff?  Do we worship God because we thing He will bless us?  Does God have to buy our worship with things?  If God asked you to sacrifice some material possession to truly worship Him would you be able to?  Can God take these blessings as easily as He gives them and count on you to worship Him or does He have to buy your love because as the song said Money Can’t Buy You Love?

III.               Do we worship God because of protection?

The loss of Job’s material possessions and his children is just the tip of the iceberg.  The rabbit hole gets much deeper.  In chapter 2 Job continues in his freefall from prosperity.  Undaunted by his failure to turn Job by destroying his stuff and children Satan get permission from God to attack Job with sores all over his body.  Not only is Job physically miserable but his wife looks at him and says curse God and die.  I do not know about you but that would significantly damage my relationship with my wife.  But Job’s response is recorded in Job 2:10.

2:10 He replied, “You are talking like a foolish woman. Shall we accept good from God, and not trouble?” In all this, Job did not sin in what he said.

In a brief 2 chapters Job goes from being the greatest man in all the east to a wretched devastated man who has nothing left in this world, not even his health or a single companion.  He is so bad that when his friends come to comfort him they hardly recognize him and then just sit there for a week not saying a word.  This is usually where we stop with Job’s trials but I believe the rabbit hole of Job’s agony goes deeper then this.  Throughout this experience Job actually loses a few more things that I think rocked his world even more than the first two chapters.

IV.              Do we worship God because he makes sense in our theological system?

The main theological belief system of Job’s day was obedience to God leads to a blessed life and disobedience to God leads to a cursed life.  This is what everybody believed.  Look at a series of excerpts from Job’s three friends and even Elihu at the end.

Eliphaz  in Job 4:7-9 “Consider now: Who, being innocent, has ever perished?  Where were the upright ever destroyed?  As I have observed, those who plow evil and those who sow trouble reap it.  At the breath of God they are destroyed; at the blast of his anger they perish.

Bildad in Job 8:20 “Surely God does not reject a blameless man or strengthen the hands of evildoers. 

Zophar in Job 20:4-5 “Surely you know how it has been from of old, ever since man was placed on the earth, that the mirth of the wicked is brief, the joy of the godless lasts but a moment.

Elihu in Job 34:11 He repays a man for what he has done; he brings upon him what his conduct deserves.

We are okay with Job’s friends believing this but what we often do not realize is that this is Job’s theological belief system before the events of chapters 1 and 2.  Job believed what everyone else believed yet his personal life experience of God’s actions would not fit into his theological system.  He had no theological boxes to put this kind of God into.  Job is suffering through this before David wrote Psalm 22, before Isaiah’s concept of the suffering servant, before the Maccabean persecutions and most importantly before the death and resurrection of Christ.  He does not have the theological concept of a righteous sufferer.  In this process he loses his theology.  He never loses his belief in God but he loses a lot of his beliefs about God.

Job 9:21-24 (NIV)

“Although I am blameless,

       I have no concern for myself;

       I despise my own life.

It is all the same; that is why I say,

       ‘He destroys both the blameless and the wicked.’

When a scourge brings sudden death,

       he mocks the despair of the innocent.

When a land falls into the hands of the wicked,

       he blindfolds its judges.

       If it is not he, then who is it?

 

What is more important to us, our nice theological system in which God fits into perfectly or God himself?  I do not know about you but this is the most significant challenge to me.  Would I still worship God if He did not make as much sense to me as He does now?  What happens when your theology runs out?  Do you abandon God as well?  Do you need the God of the universe to fit into your conceptual ideas?  Does God have to buy our worship by making sense to us?

           

V.                 Do we worship God because of powerful spiritual experiences?

Finally, I think the last thing Job loses is the experiential aspect of a relationship with God.  Listen to his lament in

 

Job 29: 2 -5

“How I long for the months gone by,

       for the days when God watched over me,

when his lamp shone upon my head

       and by his light I walked through darkness!

Oh, for the days when I was in my prime,

       when God’s intimate friendship blessed my house,

when the Almighty was still with me

       and my children were around me,”

First of all, Job had an intimate personal relationship with God.  He expected to be heard by God.  He expected God to be with him.  Yet in this, his darkest hour of need, he was unable to access that relationship.  In Job 1:5 we see Job acting as priest for his family.  He offers sacrifices for his children’s sins.  He offered those sacrifices in the expectation that God will accept his prayer for his children.  Those children died!  The relationship Job depended upon was no longer present.

This idea of God’s withdrawal of emotional and relational connection with us has a long history in Christianity and Biblical tradition.  David filled the Psalms with it.  The first verse of Psalm 22 is the characteristic Biblical reference.  Jesus quotes Psalm 22 while on the cross to express his feeling of distance from God the Father.  Isaiah and Jeremiah both talk about feeling distance between them and the Almighty.  Then in historical Christianity we see many references to it.  St. John of the Cross calls it the “dark night of the soul.”  It is labeled elsewhere as the “cloud of unknowing.”  Jean-Pierre de Caussade refers to the “dark night of faith.”  George Fox and Madame Guyon both wrote about it.  Recently, Richard Foster termed it the “prayer of the forsaken.”  In Latin it was “Deus Absconditus;” the God who is hidden.  My favorite is a description by George Buttrick.  “It’s like beating on Heaven’s door with bruised knuckles in the dark.”

I want to make it clear here.  No one loses their relationship with God but it is possible to lose the emotional sense of that relationship.  Job was not disconnected from God in any real sense but he felt disconnected from God.  There is a big difference.  When, as Christians, we feel abandoned by God our feelings are not reality.  However; they can significantly impact our ability to worship the Almighty.  The question is: Do we worship God because of how it makes us feel?  Does God need to buy our worship through spiritual highs?  If we were to never have another spiritual and emotional high would we still worship God?

VI.              Job Restored

Job 42:7-10

After the LORD had said these things to Job, he said to Eliphaz the Temanite, “I am angry with you and your two friends, because you have not spoken of me what is right, as my servant Job has. So now take seven bulls and seven rams and go to my servant Job and sacrifice a burnt offering for yourselves. My servant Job will pray for you, and I will accept his prayer and not deal with you according to your folly. You have not spoken of me what is right, as my servant Job has.”

So Eliphaz the Temanite, Bildad the Shuhite and Zophar the Naamathite did what the LORD told them; and the LORD accepted Job’s prayer. After Job had prayed for his friends, the LORD made him prosperous again and gave him twice as much as he had before.

This is one of the most amazing passages in all of Scripture.  First, of all God calls Job his servant four times.  Secondly, God says that Job has spoken of Him what is right.  Then God appoints Job as mediator for his friends.  Just a reminder the last people Job tried to mediate for, his children, died.    This is the amazing part; Job prays for his friends while he is sitting there still with boils, still devastated from the loss of everything he has, with huge theological questions still unanswered and spiritual issues between him and God.  God appoints Job in this condition as priest for his friends.  God accepts Job’s prayer.  Finally, in verse 10 God restores Job’s fortunes.

Job was given every excuse not to worship God.  Everything he had was destroyed.  His family was taken from him.  His health was ruined.  None of his experiences were making any theological sense.  God even withdrew the blessing of relating to him through spiritual experiences.  Yet Job still came through the experience with God as his God.  Whatever we are going through, and I know each one of us is going through something; it does not have to lead us away from the worship of God.  God is the Lord of the universe and He deserves our worship no matter what.

Euclid, Einstein and Everyboy Else: A Christian Response to Relativism

July 13th, 2008

Relativity

Light splits earth and sky.

Red divides blue from brown;

Splinters from white,

Fractures into hues.

Sighted from the west,

A red sun rises.

It is born yellow into blue.

Seen from the east,

A red sun sets.

It dies purple into brown.

Skin separates me and you;

Inside delineated from here and there,

Division of persons,

Membrane incorporated.

Viewed from within,

I Am He;

A soul in need of a world.

Seen from without,

He might be;

A body in need of a soul.

A good definition for relativism comes from the Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry: “Relativism is the philosophical position that all points of view are equally valid and that all truth is relative to the individual.”[i] Relativism’s basic assumption is that the truth is dependent upon perspective. Like the sun in the poem depending upon your position it could be rising or setting, depending upon your position truth is different according to the Relativist. Reality is dependent upon the observer and the observer is created by observation. Today we are going to examine Relativism. First, I want to take you on a portion of the journey of how we got here. How did Relativism develop as a worldview? Then we will talk about what Relativism is and the logical problems it creates. Finally, we are going to start building a worthwhile Christian response to relativists.

To begin let’s talk about Euclid and Geometry. Euclid was a Greek mathematician from 300 B.C. He is the founder of Geometry. More important than creating Geometry was the method he used to develop it. His method was to assume a small set of intuitively apparent statements and then to build his entire system off of them. An intuitively apparent statement is one that is so simple and makes so much sense that it seems obvious. Euclid’s five intuitively apparent statements are called axioms and from these axioms he proved much of what we know as Geometry. An example of one of Euclid’s axioms is “you can draw a straight line between any two points.” This is an obvious statement to us but the systematic use of these axioms was a revolutionary breakthrough by Euclid. As my cousin says, “If you get there early enough you can invent anything.” He was speaking in reference to one of our distant relatives who invented the white line on the side of the road but the statement works in Euclid’s case as well. Euclid’s geometrical system lasted unscathed for over 2000 years.[ii]

During the time of the Renaissance and into the Enlightenment, human reason and scientific knowledge became the epitome of knowing and understanding the universe. Humanity was discovering vast amounts of information through logic and reason supplemented with experimentation and investigation. The poster child for this endeavor was Euclid’s Geometry. Every other area of knowledge wanted to be Geometry. Biology, Chemistry, Psychology, Physics, Philosophy, Mathematics and Theology all had Euclidean envy. They all wanted to be able to develop a small set of intuitively apparent axioms and then build the rest of their field from these statements. Reason was king, Science was the queen and Geometry was the capital.

Then the unspeakable happened. In the 1800’s, two independent mathematicians published works with internally consistent geometrical systems that disregarded Euclid’s fifth axiom. Non-Euclidean Geometry was born.[iii] The pinnacle of Reason and Science, Euclid’s Geometry, was no longer absolutely true in all situations. A can of worms was opened. The cat was let out of the bag. This led to a laundry list of startling new concepts and discoveries. Newtonian Physics soon fell when Einstein started talking about bending time and space.[iv] Time became relative. Then we become even more unsure as Heisenberg demonstrates that the more certain we are as to the location of an object the less certain we can be with its momentum and the more certain we are with an object’s momentum the less certain we are with its location.[v] It’s like trying to tell someone where you are as you are driving at the atomic level. The best we can say is “I just passed…” or “I’m between … and ….” An important blast during the destruction of the modern worldview and objective truth was the observer effect. This showed that at a quantum level the observer can change reality by looking for certain properties instead of others. It would be like if the action of looking for red cars actually turns all the cars red. All observers beware because the mere act of observation changes what you are observing.[vi] These discoveries incontrovertibly show one significant thing. Science cannot be dependent upon to be the reservoir of absolute knowledge!

Erwin Schrödinger takes the cat that was let out of the bag and puts it into a box. In the box with the cat he places a sealed vial of deadly poison. If the box is disturbed enough the vial will break and the poison will be released. The cat will die. However; in Schrödinger’s experiment we can never know if the cat is alive or dead unless we actually look into the box. In the realm of knowledge the cat is simultaneously alive and dead until we look into the box.[vii] Our observation of reality determines reality. Should we look into the box? Just remember if the cat is dead you killed it by looking.

Today, when we open Schrödinger’s box, the cat is alive and has evolved into an elephant. Hush, now there is an elephant in the room that we do not want to talk about. The elephant is that Reason and Science have been shown unable to deliver absolute truth. What we once thought was the pinnacle of knowledge is no longer able to satiate our desire to know. Mr. Elephant raises his trunk and asks the question, “If Reason and Science are not able to show us absolute truth does absolute truth even exist?” I almost forgot. The poison is good enough to drink.

We have been really scientific up until this point and for that I’m sorry but the main point of this entire diatribe is what happened when these ideas hit the mainstream. When Euclid’s death and Einstein’s relativity start being discussed on the pages of popular science magazines and in the halls after introductory Philosophy classes and around coffee tables at bookstores and posted on amateur websites, it officially marks the beginning of the Post-modern era. Relativity and uncertainty and the observer effect and indeterminism combined in the public sphere to form relativism and launch us into Post-modernity. Just as Video Killed the Radio Star, relativism killed the modern man.

The story of relativism is the story of the Elephant. In this story six blind men visit the palace of the Rajah and encounter an elephant for the first time. Each one touches the elephant and announces his discoveries.

The first blind man put out his hand and touched the side of the Elephant. “How smooth! An elephant is like a wall.” The second blind man put out his hand and touched the trunk of the elephant. “How round! An elephant is like a snake.” The third blind man put out his hand and touched the tusk of the elephant. “How sharp! An elephant is like a spear.” The fourth blind man put out his hand and touched the leg of the elephant. “How tall! An elephant is like a tree.” The fifth blind man put out his hand and touched the ear of the elephant. “How wide! An elephant is like a fan.” The sixth blind man put out his hand and touched the tail of the elephant. “How thin! An elephant is like a rope.”

The blind men began to argue about what the elephant was like. Each made claims that their perception of the elephant was the truth about the elephant. Until the Rajah calls out, “The elephant is a big animal. Each man touched only one part. You must put all the parts together to find out what the elephant is like.”

The blind men were enlightened by the Rajah’s statement and reached the agreement, “Each of us knows only a part. To find the whole truth we must put all the parts together.”[viii]

This story illustrates that each individual’s access to absolute truth is limited by their perspective. As theories of relativism develop not only does absolute truth become inaccessible but it ceases to exist. Friedrich Nietzsche puts it this way, “You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, and the only way, it does not exist.”[ix] As I said before a good definition of Relativism is “the philosophical position that all points of view are equally valid and that all truth is relative to the individual.” Philosophical Relativism has a couple of current cultural applications. The most prominent is in the area of morality. There is no absolute right and wrong. There is no absolute good and evil. All moral decisions are a matter of personal preference somewhat akin to a decision to eat a certain flavor of ice cream. The second application is Religious Pluralism. All religions are equally valid and God is equally accessible through all faiths. No religious statements are absolutely true but only relatively true to individuals, again like ice cream. What flavor of God do you want today?

All forms of Relativism are easily defeated on a philosophical level. In actuality relativism is much like the Philadelphia Eagles; self-defeating. The statement that there are no absolute truths is a statement of absolute truth. If it is true then it is also false because if it is true then there is at least one statement of absolute truth. The same is true for moral relativism and religious relativism. They are all self-defeating. The only way the blind men know that they are wrong is if the Rajah has access to the true nature of the elephant. However; being able to defeat something philosophically is not the same as defeating it on the everyday level. Most persons in the general public who hold a relativistic worldview are extremely vague about what they believe. Intellectually discussing their view is often like trying to nail Jell-o to the wall. It just doesn’t seem to stick.

So how do we engage Relativism in the public sphere with positive results? How well we do this is of the utmost importance because Post-modernism has created the greatest opportunity for Christianity since the Reformation. As a worldview Post-modernism does not exist. The modern man is dying but we do not know what will come next. Post-modernism is the void between dominant worldviews. Modern man who was not a friend or ally to Christianity is in critical condition and will soon pass away. The church should celebrate this. We should give modern man an amazing wake. A worldview whose sole sources of truth are human reason and scientific investigation has little room for true Christianity. The death of this worldview creates space for Christianity to exist in the public sphere. The death of modernism is awesome but that is only the tip of the iceberg.

For the first time the church is watching, awake and aware, as the western worldview changes. For the first time we have the ability to lay the foundation for the worldview to come. Instead of the church adapting to the dominant and existing worldview like we did during the modern era, the church has the ability to shape the worldview. This is an unprecedented chance not seen since Augustine’s City of God and the fall of the Roman Empire. May we seriously consider how we can intelligently speak into the void that is Post-modernism creating a truly Biblical worldview. How do you create a truly Biblical worldview? The same way you eat an elephant, one bite at a time. What follows is not the end of the discussion but actually only a suggestion of where to start, a few pieces of a puzzle to be filled in by others.

John 14:6 + 7″I am the way, the truth, and the life!” Jesus answered. “Without me, no one can go to the Father. If you had known me, you would have known the Father. But from now on, you do know him, and you have seen him.” (CEV)

We have learned that absolute truth cannot be found in human reason and scientific investigation. But where can truth be found? Jesus doesn’t say these ideas are truth. He doesn’t say the words are true. He doesn’t say this evidence is true. He says I am Truth. There is an extremely personal aspect to truth because the God who creates truth is a personal God. That is why we use witnesses in courtrooms and experts on TV. We believe things because of who says them. If the personal source is credible then the statement is credible. That is why every scientific journal article ever published has had names attached to it. Relativism highlights this, however; in Christianity we have an ultimate and absolute person, and even persons, who make up the Trinity. Truth is not impersonal it is very personal. It is grounded in the persons of the Trinity. God is not true. Jesus is not true. The truth is Godly. Truth is not some outside system that evaluates God but God defines truth and we can know this truth through Jesus. Our modern quest to find absolute truth outside of the persons of the Trinity was doomed to fail. I am ecstatic I was around to see that happen.

Exodus 3:14 + 15 God said to Moses: I am the eternal God. So tell them that the LORD, whose name is “I Am,” has sent you. This is my name forever, and it is the name that people must use from now on. (CEV)

A huge modern debate was if God was logical or was logic Godly. Does logic define God or does God define logic. It is very clear where the Bible stands on this. God’s name as “I Am” means an immense number of things but one of those meanings, and the most important for our discussion today, is that God defines himself. There is no outside standard to which God needs to bow. God is and that is his definition. He defines himself, and through his being, defines everything else. From a truly Biblical perspective God is not logical or reasonable but reason and logic are Godly. God is not like logic. Logic is like God. God defines reason and logic. For centuries modern man has exalted human reason to the place of an idol, to the position of a false God. I celebrate watching it fall and be placed back into worship of the Trinity.

1John 4:8 God is love, and anyone who doesn’t love others has never known him. (CEV)

As we said earlier as absolute truth died in the eyes of the general public so did moral truth. We see society constantly questioning the existence of absolute right and wrong. It is commonly held that right and wrong, good and evil are determined by individuals or their societies. As a Christian I like this idea. It is very close to Theology. I agree with the idea that moral right and wrong can only be known and defined through interactions of individuals within a society. If you take a step back and examine Christian morality we hold that God defines morality. Who is God? God is a Trinity. The Trinity is three persons interacting with each other in an eternally loving relationship. They are so united that they can truly be called one entity. The Trinity by example is the perfect definition of right and wrong, not an abstract definition but a very practical definition. As Christians we have absolute moral standards because we have an absolutely perfect community of persons completely and eternally united in love that can model those standards for us. The Golden Rule, which can be found in most religions in some form, is not an abstract principle in Christianity but an eternal principle lived out moment by moment in the Trinity. As Christians look to define morality our answer has to be in the love demonstrated by the Trinity. But again we must stress that God is not defined by love. God through the Trinity defines love and love defines morality.

Psalms 46:10 Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth.

We have one final issue to consider. It is one thing to say that truth, logic, reason, morality and love are defined by the Trinity. It is another thing entirely to say we can have sufficient, accurate and intelligent access to know how God has defined them. Can God be known? If we cannot reasonably and logically deduce what is absolute truth then can we know God? If we cannot scientifically investigate absolute truth then can we know God? In the story of the elephant the question is “Can we be in the position of the Rajah?”

This is a slightly misleading question because our God is demonstrably different than the elephant in one important way. Our God can communicate. In the Christian story the elephant can talk. When we say, “an elephant is like…” The elephant is able to respond, “No, I’m not.” We cannot know God unless he chooses to reveal himself to us, but since the Christian God is a Trinity of persons this self-revelation is exactly what we would expect God to do. A personal God is a God who would reveal himself. He can reveal himself through the things he has made. This is called general revelation and is found in creation. He can reveal himself through the things he says. This is called special revelation. It includes scripture. He can also reveal himself through becoming like us and living among us. This is the ultimate type of revelation and is called Incarnation.

From the standpoint of this kind of God the question is not can God been known but has he revealed himself to us and if he has how. This leads us to ask questions that no relativist, pluralist or tolerant person wants us to ask. Questions like: Is this religion truly revealing of God? Or is that one? Does God speak through these Scriptures or those? Is he God’s prophet? Has God become one of us and if so who, the stranger on the bus? These are essential questions when there is a personal God who can only be known through his revelation to us.

What the Foundry has been doing over the past couple of months by examining other religions and their beliefs is exactly what we need to do if there is a God like the Christian God. Hopefully you have done that yourself as well. Have you searched for truth through the revelation of a personal God? If not then what are you relying on? I have supreme confidence that if you honestly begin this search you will come to the conclusion that the God that is revealed in creation is also the God who communicates through the Bible and the God who is incarnated in Christ Jesus of Nazareth. If you so desire I would love to walk with you on a portion of your search for absolute personal truth.



[i] http://www.carm.org/relativism/whatisrelativism.htm

[ii] http://www.mathopenref.com/euclid.html

[iii] http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/HistTopics/Non-Euclidean_geometry.html

[iv] http://royalsociety.org/page.asp?id=3848

[v] http://www.aip.org/history/heisenberg/p08.htm

[vi][vi][vi] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect

[vii] http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/528287/Erwin-Schrodinger

[viii] Lillian Quigley, The Blind Men and the Elephant (New York: Charles Scribner’s, 1959). Possible original sources of the story are the Jarkata Tales, a collection of Buddhist birth stories, and the Pancatantra Stories, Hindu religious instruction fables.

[ix]http://www.carm.org/relativism.htm

Who Are We?

July 8th, 2008

A few months ago on Drexel’s campus, I had the privilege of listening to a Tibetan Buddhist Monk, who had trained under the Dalai Lama.  He talked about the circumstances between Tibet and China.  The dialogue was interesting in how it compared to so many other situations in our world currently and throughout the past.  The conflict stemmed around the simple concept of “us” and “them.” Who are “we” as a group?  Who are “they” – the group that is not “us”; the group that is “different from us”?  In Tibet the Tibetans see themselves as distinct from the Chinese.  They say we are Tibetans and Chinese are not us, however; the Chinese have a different definition.  They say that the Tibetans have been and are a part of China.  They are not distinct from us but one of us.  The Chinese say what is good for China is also good for the Tibetans because the Tibetans are part of China.  The Tibetans respond saying what is good for China has actually been bad for Tibet and the Tibetans.  China points to the roads, schools, businesses and homes that they have brought into Tibet.  They point to the way they have developed Tibet.  The Tibetans see these things and point out that these developments have only been good for the Chinese residents of Tibet.  The Chinese rebuttal is that all the residents of Tibet are Chinese.

                We try to define “us and them” in terms that is most beneficial to us.  We label them as different from us.  What is different from us is necessarily wrong.  What is wrong now becomes evil and eventually what is evil can be punished.  This can happen because of differences in skin color, sex, ability, financial standing, ethnic heritage, lifestyle, religious beliefs and nationality.  I am always right and you are different than me so that makes you wrong.  Because you are willfully wrong you must be evil.  Because you are evil I can be justified in my hatred, prejudice and violence toward you.  This is the common course of human thinking.  We see this line of thinking in the Crusades.  We see this used to justify slavery.  Wars are always fought over the concept of us and them.

                The current and popular remedy for the problem of us and them is to deny the existence of any differences whatsoever.  All people are exactly the same.  All cultures are equally good and valuable.  All thoughts and ideas are equally valid.  All religions are equally true.  All moral choices are equally justifiable.  Right and wrong are no longer absolute choices but a matter of personal preference.  Tolerance is today’s moral buzz word.  We must be accepting of those different than us.  Yet this brings up some logical absurdities.  If there are no moral rights and wrongs how do we label things that we know as true evil?  How do we say the prison camps at Auschwitz were true evil?  How do we say something is truly good?  If there is no absolute good and bad how can the sacrificial love of a mother be truly labeled as good?  Even the very statement “there are no moral absolutes” is an absolute moral statement.  In classical logic that is called a self-defeating argument.  A self-defeating argument is one that if it is true, it is also false.  If there are no moral absolutes then even the statement there are no moral absolutes is not absolute.

                Miroslav Volf, a professor at Yale Divinity School, changes the discussion.  The destruction of differences is not the goal.  There will always be the categories of us and them.  There will always be those people like us and those unlike us.  We will always separate, categorize and differentiate between people.  There are some differences that cannot be overlooked.  What is necessary is that we must become the type of people able to embrace or love the “evil other.”  Volf’s hometown is Sarajevo.  He was actually interrogated / tortured as a Christian while serving in the Yugoslavian army.  He then watched his country and city be torn apart by violent civil wars.  The “evil other” is not an abstract idea.  To him the evil other is the Yugoslavian Army captain that tried to force him to confess crimes against the state.  To him the evil other is the Serbian Cetnik Terrorist that mortared his hometown.  Miroslav Volf truly knows the concept of the evil other.  He cannot deny that some actions are atrocious but how does he live in this world in the presence of true evil?  How does he love the evil doer?

                For answer to these questions we are going to look at a particular passage of Scripture found in Daniel 9.  This is a prayer uttered by Daniel for his people the Israelites.  I’m going to read it in full stopping from time to time to make some commentary.

Daniel 9:1-19 (New International Version)

Daniel’s Prayer

 1 In the first year of Darius son of Ahasuerus (a Mede by descent), who was made ruler over the Babylonian kingdom- 2 in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, understood from the Scriptures, according to the word of the LORD given to Jeremiah the prophet, that the desolation of Jerusalem would last seventy years. 3 So I turned to the Lord God and pleaded with him in prayer and petition, in fasting, and in sackcloth and ashes.

First thing I want to point out is that even though Daniel was a prophet of God who received divine revelations directly from God he still sought the Word of the Lord through the already written scriptures.  Secondly, the book and prophecies of Jeremiah were only recorded about 80 years prior to this moment and yet Daniel regarded them as Scripture.  Next, I notice that the return of the Israelites from exile is prophesied to happen after seventy years, however; Daniel takes it upon himself to pray and fast for this prophesy to come to pass.  That says a lot about our participation within the Divine plan of God.  As we look further into the text notice how many first person plural pronouns are there.

 4 I prayed to the LORD my God and confessed:
“O Lord, the great and awesome God, who keeps his covenant of love with all who love him and obey his commands, 5 we have sinned and done wrong. We have been wicked and have rebelled; we have turned away from your commands and laws. 6 We have not listened to your servants the prophets, who spoke in your name to our kings, our princes and our fathers, and to all the people of the land.  7 “Lord, you are righteous, but this day we are covered with shame—the men of Judah and people of Jerusalem and all Israel, both near and far, in all the countries where you have scattered us because of our unfaithfulness to you. 8 O LORD, we and our kings, our princes and our fathers are covered with shame because we have sinned against you. 9 The Lord our God is merciful and forgiving, even though we have rebelled against him; 10 we have not obeyed the LORD our God or kept the laws he gave us through his servants the prophets. 11 All Israel has transgressed your law and turned away, refusing to obey you.
“Therefore the curses and sworn judgments written in the Law of Moses, the servant of God, have been poured out on us, because we have sinned against you. 12 You have fulfilled the words spoken against us and against our rulers by bringing upon us great disaster. Under the whole heaven nothing has ever been done like what has been done to Jerusalem. 13 Just as it is written in the Law of Moses, all this disaster has come upon us, yet we have not sought the favor of the LORD our God by turning from our sins and giving attention to your truth. 14 The LORD did not hesitate to bring the disaster upon us, for the LORD our God is righteous in everything he does; yet we have not obeyed him.

Daniel intentionally, willingly, freely and deliberately accepts the sin of his people as his own.  From a human perspective he did not necessarily have to do this.  He was taken captive into Babylon as a man probably in his late teens.  He could have easily distanced himself from the sins that Israel had committed in the land because of his young age when he went into exile.  He could have prayed about what they did back then.  He chose not to.  He chose to accept moral responsibility for the sins of his people.  Also, in scripture Daniel is one of the few people not directly implicated in any sin.  He is pictured as a morally righteous person.  He is shown as someone who is willing to do the right thing for God no matter how it will affect him.  The story about Daniel and the lion’s den is a prime example of this.  He could have separated himself from them by his upright and righteous life.  He could have been like the Pharisee in Jesus’ parable and prayed

11The Pharisee stood up and prayed about himself: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other men—robbers, evildoers, adulterers—or even like this tax collector. 12I fast twice a week and give a tenth of all I get.’

Instead Daniel through his pray becomes one with his people.  Their sin is his sin.  Their suffering is his suffering.  Their punishment is his punishment.  Harold A. Sevener says, “Never once does Daniel exclude himself from the sins of the nation.  Never once does he blame the people, while claiming to be exempt from their sin problem.”  Often we try to define us and them in the most beneficial way for us.  We try to use the categories of us and them to limit the guilt we have. 

Allow me to illustrate.  91% of outsiders to Christianity between the ages of 16 to 29 label Christianity as anti-homosexual.  Sexual morals are important to us and they should be but sometimes we present them to the exclusion of others.  91% don’t think that we are against homosexuality and for “family values.”  91% think we are against the homosexual.  We have created an “us and them” mentality.  Peter, age 34, says, “Many people in the gay community don’t seem to have issues with Jesus but rather with those claiming to represent him today.  It’s very much and ‘us-versus-them’ mentality, as if a war has been declared.  Of course each side thinks the other fired the opening shot.”  We can stand up for moral values.  That is a good thing.  But how does it look when we are defined by preaching a certain set of moral values and then Catholic priests get on the news for abusing children and then a Mormon compound is taken into federal custody.  To the outsider this is the pinnacle of hypocrisy.  Our typical response is to isolate ourselves from the moral guilt by saying “Catholics are not real Christians” and “Mormonism is a cult.”  While this has validity to an outsider it looks like political waffling, name calling, blame shifting and trying to weasel out of trouble.

Instead of trying to remove himself from guilt, Daniel accepts full responsibility for the guilt of his people.  As white, American, suburban, Protestant Christians are there sins that we need to truly own?  Who are our people and do we as a people have a collective, moral guilt?  Is slavery still an issue?  Do we owe something to Native Americans?  Japanese Americans?  The Jewish people? Muslims? Women?  The unborn?  Quite often as Christians we try to separate ourselves from the sins of others.  We claim that we had no part in slavery.  We claim that we had nothing to do with the Crusades.  We claim that abortion is their problem and not ours.  We claim that homosexuality is not our issue but others.  We distance ourselves so that their guilt doesn’t rub off on us.

15 “Now, O Lord our God, who brought your people out of Egypt with a mighty hand and who made for yourself a name that endures to this day, we have sinned, we have done wrong. 16 O Lord, in keeping with all your righteous acts, turn away your anger and your wrath from Jerusalem, your city, your holy hill. Our sins and the iniquities of our fathers have made Jerusalem and your people an object of scorn to all those around us. 17 Now, our God, hear the prayers and petitions of your servant. For your sake, O Lord, look with favor on your desolate sanctuary. 18 Give ear, O God, and hear; open your eyes and see the desolation of the city that bears your Name. We do not make requests of you because we are righteous, but because of your great mercy. 19 O Lord, listen! O Lord, forgive! O Lord, hear and act! For your sake, O my God, do not delay, because your city and your people bear your Name.”

Daniel then turns in his prayer to petition God for grace and mercy for his people.  God’s deliverance in the past gives Daniel hope for deliverance in the future.  God has shown himself to be merciful in the past so we can expect him to be merciful in the future.  God has shown himself to be a gracious and loving God.  We can trust in him to be gracious and loving once more.  Daniel does not demand that God fulfill his prophecy.  Daniel does not claim that he has any right to be heard or any special knowledge of God’s will.  Daniel merely and meekly petitions for mercy.  His petition for mercy is not based on merit at all.  No one not even Daniel deserves the mercy of God but everyone can request it.  In so doing Daniel becomes like Christ.  In accepting the sins of his people as his own and asking for mercy he models Christ.  The grace that is available to Daniel is only available to Daniel because of Christ.

                Let’s take a step back and see this story replayed on a cosmic scale.  The Trinity eternally existed in a perfect community, a Holy symphony of us.  You have the Father who intimately and passionately and completely loves the Son and the Spirit.  Then you have the Son who is perfectly united in love with the Father and the Spirit.  Then you have the Spirit who dwells in an eternal Holy relationship with both the Father and the Son.  Three persons so completely united in an eternal loving relationship that they are truly one being.  The Trinity is the true definition of community.  They are the true definition of an “us.”  This Trinity creates.  The Trinity creates humanity to be in the image of God.  Part of this image was to be in relationship with God; however, because of sin we have severed that relationship. We have become unlike God.  We have destroyed relationships.  If God is an eternal community of loving relationships, that is the Trinity, and we are the destroyer of relationships, that makes us completely and totally unlike God.  We are the antithesis of God.  In God’s eyes we are truly the “evil other.”  Every single one of us is the “evil other.”

                From a human perspective God had every right to sever all ties with us.  He could have easily chosen to distance himself from us.  He would be just to allow us to eternally exist separated from Him.  He doesn’t want to get contaminated by our sin.  He doesn’t want to become infected with our guilt.  But this not the God I serve.  The Trinity intentionally, willingly, freely, and deliberately sends Jesus directly into our mess.  God becomes man.  He lives a perfect human life.  He suffers enormous human suffering.  He takes on our human sin and human guilt. He dies an atrocious human death.  Then three days later he is resurrected into new life.  Making his life our model, his death our atonement and his resurrection our hope.  Through Jesus, the community of the Trinity missionally leaves heaven and sacrificially becomes human so that He can redemptively restore us to a right relationship with him.  As humans this is our God, our savior and our redeemer.  You don’t make Jesus Lord.  You don’t make Jesus your savior and redeemer.  He is the only Lord and the only savior and the only redeemer humanity will ever know.  He is God coming into our situation an atoning for our sin so that we can get back right with God.  The question is not is Jesus your savior.  The question is have you admitted that you need a savior and have accepted him as the only savior you could possibly have.

                For the many of us in this room we have a restored relationship with God through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, let’s now turn our attention back to Daniel.  Because Daniel knew the grace of God he was able look at his community with grace filled eyes.  He wasn’t worried about their sin contaminating him.  He was able to be Christ-like and enter into his community and pray the grace of God into their lives.  My question for each of you individually and us as a church corporately; what communities are we intentionally reaching into to redeem with the grace of God through Jesus Christ.  I would like to see us defined as a people not by the community that sits within these walls but defined by the community outside of these walls that we are intentionally, willingly, freely, deliberately and sacrificially investing ourselves into for the grace of God.  When we see the homeless in our community they are our homeless.  When we see broken families in our communities they are our families.  When we see single mothers in our community those are our mothers, or our sisters or our daughters.  When there is sin in our community it affects us as if it were our own sin.  When there is evil and pain in our community it should be our evil and our pain.

                The final question we have to answer is who our community is.  Who is God directly calling us to minister to?  Who is God calling us to minister to individually and who is God calling us to minister to corporately?  It is the question that was asked of Jesus so long ago; “Who is my neighbor?”  I cannot answer that for each of you but let share one conversation with you that I had with the Methodist Minister at Drexel.  Tim says to me, “I really feel like I’m neglecting my community and my church because I spend so much time here on this campus with the students.”  My reply was, “I know exactly what you are talking about so much so that I have just completely accepted Drexel as my community that I am going to intentionally invest in.”  I think each one of us will personally have a different community in which we will invest ourselves into for the sake of the kingdom of God.  For some it will be children, others students, others the homeless.  For some it will be a geographic location like their street or their apartment building.  For others it will be a life situation, pregnant teenagers, or football players, or homosexuals.  Ethnic groups are a possibility as well.  Religions and worldviews are another category.  Then as a body under the leadership of the elders and hopefully with the guidance of the mission committee we also need to answer this question on a corporate scale.  Who is the community, who are the communities that G